| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Indefinite Hulkageddon now including T1 Barges? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: but it will be the case. i doubt people were ganking covetors before this announcement because there was no hulkageddon rewards for it (as far as i understand). now there's more reason to gank a covetor, in addition more pilo...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.09 12:44:00
|
162. Yet Another Invention Question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Casiella Truza wrote: You are because I've gotten 10 run T2 BPCs on ammo with no decryptors. why would anyone buy the +9 run and -2ME decryptors then?
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.08 15:46:00
|
163. Indefinite Hulkageddon now including T1 Barges? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Dave stark wrote: shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Bugsy VanHalen wrote: If the demand for covetors increases due to increased covetor ganking than the demand will go up, regardless of whether it is hulks or covetors selling. . that makes ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.08 15:18:00
|
164. Indefinite Hulkageddon now including T1 Barges? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: If the demand for covetors increases due to increased covetor ganking than the demand will go up, regardless of whether it is hulks or covetors selling. . that makes no sense, sorry. IF Miners buy Covetors instead ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.08 14:22:00
|
165. Yet Another Invention Question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
you dont need max run BPC`s anymore to use Decryptors, but you still won`t get more than 1 run without decryptors if im not totally mistaken
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.08 13:24:00
|
166. Indefinite Hulkageddon now including T1 Barges? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Mr Sato wrote: If it turns out to become a reality, it could affect the demand for Covetors (which actually have increased in price slightly where I reside). So my fellow indy players, new opportunities ahead =) I dont want to kill your ill...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.08 09:46:00
|
167. Rats at Grav Sites - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: NPC rats are not the problem it's getting pointed by others and you have to think that that solo t1 frig that just entered system cand drop a cyno and turn into a capital fleet in a split second. Unless you fully control...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.06 12:51:00
|
168. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
lets face it, no idea who came up with that, but the BPC-compesnation Idea is just a really bad one, for so many reasons. you have to consider the the changes you are looking for would only take in place WHEN these BPC`s are used in a cple years ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.05 19:23:00
|
169. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: sure, I BET If I would ask you now, to proove your ownership of T2 Ship BPO`s, we would just hear an excuse why you cant/want do that, right? -> Tadeo Musashy wrote: - i'll ignore your 1st req. as i'm no...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.03 17:29:00
|
170. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tadeo Musashy wrote: . i also want to point out that i DO own some T2BPOs ( at least one of those would worth well in excess of 100bill at current market prices) and i wouldnt sell any of them no matter the offer... therefore i could say i'm...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.03 14:51:00
|
171. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Sweet, please spawn more T2BPO for newer players please or .... hahaha so your trying to convince us that T2 BPO`s should be removed becuase they make invention pointless, or generally HURT THE GAME SO MUCH for 25 pa...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.02 09:36:00
|
172. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tadeo Musashy wrote: shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: T2 BPOs do make very passive income for a very large price. For the time it takes to get a return on your investment, the capital could better be spent in other areas.[/i]..... errr... loo...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.01 13:14:00
|
173. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: I see no justification to get rid of them atm; if CCP Diagoras or EyoG could delve into how many T2 BPOs exist at the moment and what level of impact they have on the Invention market, I would consider that enough infor...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.31 18:18:00
|
174. [webapp] EVE Production Mixer. Spring 2012 updates - in Science and Industry [original thread]
very nice
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.30 23:35:00
|
175. Career Change - in Science and Industry [original thread]
like clixor said, S&I is about as much "clicking-work" as PVE grinding is, with the diffrence that you dont have to wait for a cple hours after you killed 11 rats but can bind in more chars. Quote: So yes, you can turn that 46b into 100b ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.30 12:07:00
|
176. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Diemos Hiaraki wrote: I ignored your replies for good reason, yet that reason isn't something I'm going to commit to writing; for now I ask you to accept that instinct told me not to reply until now. . in a discussion you ignore these pa...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.30 00:44:00
|
177. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: There you go: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 Also rephrased to be more clear that it's about opinions :) No doubt its about opinons, but these opinions should rather be about what people like ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.29 01:33:00
|
178. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
for example Quote: - what would be the consequence of removing all T2 BPOs from the game for inventor profit (more, same, less) - what would be the consequence of removing all T2 BPOs from the game for inventor numbers (more, same, less) th...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.29 01:13:00
|
179. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
yea and none of these polls could actually be answered by any players honestly since we simply dont have the backround information like CCP does. gues thats the reason why we never see any polls. If you would ask all players if they actually lik...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.29 00:42:00
|
180. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: That's right my alts are everywhere muwwahwhwahwahwabut for realz . so cool. b2 off-topic: I only picked 3 examples...Marrco Polio, Daxine Myth, sitar seaton ALL of them had the very first post ITT or posting a hate ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.05.28 12:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |